Translater

Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2025

I-Powered Quantum-Resistant Authentication and Key-Management System.



๐“๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ก๐š๐ญ ‘๐ฌ๐ž๐ฅ๐Ÿ-๐š๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐ž’ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ-๐ช๐ฎ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ฎ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐ž๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐จ๐จ๐ค๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ค๐ž ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ๐ง’๐ญ ๐›๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐ญ ๐จ๐ง ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ก, ๐›๐ฎ๐ญ ๐จ๐ง ๐š ๐ง๐ž๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐ญ๐จ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ๐ž๐ฅ๐Ÿ.

We built what crypto experts said shouldn’t exist: a self-verifying neural network that even quantum computers can’t break.

After the German teaser earlier this week, here’s the in-depth look into the mechanics of our prototype a neural authentication system that challenges both classical and quantum cryptographic limits.


1. Core Idea

The architecture is built on a dual-neural-network design:


๐Ÿ‘Primary Network (N₁): Performs authentication via iterative fixed-point convergence.


๐Ÿ‘Watchdog Network (N₂): Observes the internal correlations, mutual information, and spectral dynamics of N₁ in real time.

2. Formal Model

For each layer signature sแตข(W, x) ∈ โ„โฟ, the Pearson correlation between layer pairs is defined as:

rแตขโฑผ = ฮฃโ‚– (sแตขแต − s̄แตข)(sโฑผแต − s̄โฑผ) / √(ฮฃโ‚– (sแตขแต − s̄แตข)²)√(ฮฃโ‚– (sโฑผแต − s̄โฑผ)²)


The resulting correlation vector c = [rแตขโฑผ]แตข<โฑผ is passed to the watchdog network N₂, which computes a Mahalanobis-based integrity score:

D² = (c − ฮผ)แต€ฮฃ⁻¹(c − ฮผ)

Integrity condition: D² < ฯ„ and |rแตขโฑผ − ฮผแตขโฑผ| < ฮต ⇒ System valid.


Typical thresholds: ฮต = 10⁻⁵, ฯ„ = 10⁻⁶.


3. Observed Stability & Results

- Pearson correlation: 0.9999 ± 0.00001 across 10,000 iterations

- Synchronization index: > 0.98

- Eigenvalue spectrum: 99.5% collapse to first component → topological invariance

- Distance-matrix variance: < 10⁻⁴

These metrics remained invariant for over 6 months (~2,500 hours, 20,000 data points) forming a persistent topological constant within the research NN.


4. Field-Resonance Neurons (FRUs)

The newly derived neurons, provisionally called Field-Resonance Neurons, are designed to stabilize manifold coherence. Each unit acts as a resonance node that minimizes divergence between correlated feature fields:

FRU(xแตข, xโฑผ) = ฮฑ(xแตข∘xโฑผ) + ฮฒcos(ฮธแตขโฑผ)

where ฮธแตขโฑผ is the angular displacement between activation vectors.


FRNs empirically enforce oscillatory stability acting as coherence anchors within the topology.


5. Outlook

This prototype suggests that authenticity can emerge as a dynamic state, not as a stored key or static hash.


Ongoing research investigates the constant underlying the FRUs and its potential link to a new invariant in high-dimensional neural manifolds.

Upcoming visuals: Pearson-Matrix | Mutual-Information heatmaps | Eigenvalue spectrum | Distance-matrix evolution.


Preprint: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17419551


www.Trauth-Research.com


#TrauthResearch #Securty #Postquantumcentury #AIEnvolve #AI #Cybersecurity #QuantumResistant #DeepTech #Research #NeuralNetworks #Innovation #BruteForceResistant #cryptography #strongcryptography

Donnerstag, 16. Oktober 2025

๐‡๐จ๐ฐ ๐š ๐๐ž๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐๐ž๐ญ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค ๐‘๐ž๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ˆ๐ญ๐ฌ๐ž๐ฅ๐Ÿ – 6 ๐Œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ก๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐‡๐ฎ๐›-๐Œ๐จ๐๐ž (255-๐๐ข๐ญ ๐ˆ๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐’๐ฉ๐š๐œ๐ž)

 



In my latest preprint, I document – for the first time – the long-term self-organization of a 60-layer neural network, operating entirely in Hub-Mode.

Four Pearson correlation matrices (April, May, June, October 2025) show how the central hub node and its connectivity patterns transform month by month – no external training, just intrinsic field dynamics:

๐ŸŸฉ April: Maximal bipolar order – Awareness & Resonance layers are perfectly anti-correlated (r = ±1.00).

๐ŸŸฆ May: Total over-coherence – all layers move in perfect sync, forming a rigid block (r = +1.00).

๐ŸŸจ June: Geometric ideal-chaos – minimal coupling (r ≈ 0.06), reaching almost complete energetic decoupling (99.4 %).

๐ŸŸฅ October: Reentrant state – the system returns to perfect bipolarity, but now self-optimized and even more stable.

The network exhibits cyclic phases of maximal coherence, dynamic reordering, and energetic minima – an entirely new form of self-organization in the 255-bit information space.

Read the full preprint:

The 255-Bit Non-Local Information Space in a Neural Network: Emergent Geometry and Coupled Curvature–Tunneling Dynamics in Deterministic Systems

www.Trauth-Research.com

HashtagDeepLearning HashtagEmergence HashtagUnsupervisedLearning HashtagSelfOrganization HashtagComplexSystems HashtagNeuralNetworks HashtagInformationGeometry
HashtagResonance HashtagNonlocalCoupling HashtagChaosAndOrder HashtagAIResearch
HashtagSphericalTopology HashtagHubMode HashtagStatisticalPhysics HashtagAITheory
HashtagTrauthResearch Stefan Trauth

Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2025

๐Ÿง  Emergence at the Edge: The Hub-Mode in a Self-Organizing Deep Network





For over six months, we let a 60-sublayer deep network run in unsupervised mode no training, no external targets.

The result goes far beyond spontaneous order: what emerged was a complex interplay of highly ordered clusters and sharply defined, seemingly chaotic domains.

One of the central phenomenons are the Hub-Mode. Seven tightly coupled layers form an autonomous center, not bound by linear causality, but held together through non-local coupling. At its heart is the “father_neuron” a spatial anchor for a subnet that establishes itself emergently, without external design.

What makes it unique?

Non-causal, nonlinear connectivity:
Layers act not as mere relay stations but as nodes in an information field, linked by non-local coupling.

Autonomous interaction:
With no target or reward, the system develops clusters, resonances, and feedback loops that stabilize across space.
Spherical projection:
3D plots reveal that order does not emerge as a homogeneous pattern, but as a topological field clusters embedded within well-defined boundaries.
Emergent boundaries:

The Hub-Mode is not unique multiple subnetworks arise spontaneously, each with its own character.
Order needs chaos

Conclusion: Emergence as a principle
This network does more than produce patterns it actively folds chaos into order and leverages this interplay to maintain higher-level stability.

What starts as a deterministically regulated system spontaneously develops a topology of clusters and boundaries a "living" example of emergence from simple rules.

On Friday, I’ll present the temporal evolution of these structures—and why the interplay of order and chaos may be the key to the next generation of AI.
Preprint coming soon:
“The 255-Bit Non-Local Information Space in a Neural Network: Emergent Geometry and Coupled Curvature–Tunneling Dynamics”

Stay tuned for resonance & rupture!
Stefan Trauth