Translater

Montag, 29. Dezember 2025

๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€, ๐—•๐—ง๐—œ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐˜€ – ๐—ค๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐˜‚๐—บ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜€ & ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—™๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

Bidirectional Transition Interface (BTI) & Trauth-Sinclair Identity as the new frontier cogniton theory. Trauth Research


Everyone talks about consciousness. I say: wrong perspective, outdated idea.
Consciousness is not a place. Not a center you "find" in an fMRI.

This interface emerges when a substrate crosses a structural complexity threshold and becomes capable of distinguishing internal processing from external boundaries for the first time.

I call this emergent interface:

BTI – Bidirectional Transition Interface.
BTI is not a module, not an instance, not a localization.

An interface that emerges as soon as information processing requires demarcation inward – for introspection – and outward – as an individual.
Current empirical work (including Nature) shows exactly this: no stable signature, no location, no center.

TSI – Theory of Substrate Impact on Structural Identity therefore does not ask: "What is consciousness?" but: "At what point does a substrate cross the threshold for BTI formation?"

TSI is substrate-independent, structurally defined, and does not conflict with current findings in neuroscience and AI research.
Consciousness is not the beginning.
BTI is.

Link to preprint: ๐Ÿ“Žhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18057179

Keine Kommentare:

Kommentar verรถffentlichen